View Full Version : Windows Media Player or Real Player?
clvmike19
01-12-2006, 09:24 AM
For the more computer savvy than I. Is there any difference between the two? ie. picture/sound quality, etc?
KungFuJesus
01-12-2006, 09:36 AM
As far as webcasts go, I've always gotten better results with the Real stream than the media player stream. However, there is absolutely no reason anybody should install or use realplayer. I use Real Alternative, a very small and much simpler player that does in a couple MB what reaplayer takes 30MB to do (not to mention how realplayer adds itself to startup, hijacks mp3 files, etc).
http://www.afterdawn.com/software/video_software/video_players/real_alternative.cfm
the deta
01-12-2006, 09:39 AM
Pssshhhhh ................... REAL PLAYER BITCHES!!!
The Dude
01-12-2006, 09:57 AM
Real Player is much better for the webcasts.
I'm going to have to say real player too.
clvmike19
01-12-2006, 11:44 AM
So overall Real Player wins....not just for webcasts
KidKnowledge
01-12-2006, 12:30 PM
realplayer bitches... i tend to stray from anything that says "windows" unless absolutely necessary... just on principle
APPLE bitches...
planetkpop
01-12-2006, 03:49 PM
i'm not crazy about real player or the real media format for that matter. however, it works well for the webcasts.
ricola
01-12-2006, 07:46 PM
doze users: please do yourself a favor and use Media Player Classic/Real Alternative.
http://www.afterdawn.com/software/video_software/video_players/media_player_classic.cfm
http://www.afterdawn.com/software/video_software/video_players/real_alternative.cfm
while youre at it, grab Quicktime Alt as well:
http://www.afterdawn.com/software/video_software/video_players/quicktime_alternative.cfm
The Real Player/Quicktime applications are whack yo
clvmike19
01-12-2006, 08:13 PM
So many links......as long as my pr0n works Im happy. /creep
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.